Quantitative finance interviews are known for their complexity, testing both mathematical prowess and creative problem-solving. If you're preparing for a quant interview at world-class firms like WorldQuant, Citadel, Susquehanna International Group, or Squarepoint Capital, it's crucial to understand the logic and technical depth behind questions frequently asked by these companies. In this comprehensive guide, we break down some of the most popular quant interview questions, provide detailed solutions, and explain the underlying concepts. Whether you’re a candidate or just curious about the interview process, this article will help you gain a deeper understanding of the kind of thinking top quant firms are looking for.

Quant Interview Questions – WorldQuant and Other Top Firms

1. Tennis Deuce Probability – Decision Making Under Uncertainty (Susquehanna International Group)

Question: If you are playing tennis and are at deuce with your rival, how would you choose to proceed? There are two options: keep playing deuce rule until you or your rival wins, or you play 3 mini points rule, where whoever wins 2 points wins the game. Assume your winning rate is 0.7 i.i.d at each point. Which rule would you pick?

Understanding the Tennis Deuce Problem

This problem tests your ability to model probability in real-world settings and make optimal decisions under uncertainty. Let’s break down both options:

• Deuce Rule: Continue playing until one player wins two consecutive points.
• 3 Mini Points Rule: Play three points; whoever wins at least two points wins.

Solution: Calculating Win Probabilities

1. Probability in 3 Mini Points Rule

Let’s denote your probability of winning a single point as \( p = 0.7 \).

You win if you get at least 2 out of 3 points. There are two ways:

• Win 2 points and lose 1
• Win all 3 points

So, the probability is:

\[ P_{3pts} = P(\text{Win 2 of 3}) + P(\text{Win all 3}) \] \[ = \binom{3}{2} p^2 (1-p) + p^3 \] \[ = 3 \times (0.7)^2 \times (0.3) + (0.7)^3 \] \[ = 3 \times 0.49 \times 0.3 + 0.343 \] \[ = 3 \times 0.147 + 0.343 \] \[ = 0.441 + 0.343 = 0.784 \]

So, under the 3 mini points rule, your probability of winning is 0.784.

2. Probability in Deuce Rule

In the standard deuce rule, you must win two points in a row before your opponent does. Let’s calculate the probability recursively.

Let \( P \) be the probability you win from deuce.

• You win the next two points: probability \( p^2 \).
• You win the first, lose the second (back to deuce): probability \( p (1-p) \).
• You lose the first (opponent has advantage): probability \( (1-p) \). If opponent wins next point, you lose; else, back to deuce.

But a simpler way is to use recursion:

Let’s denote:

• \( P \) = probability you win from deuce
• \( p \) = probability you win a point

At deuce:

• With probability \( p \), you win the next point (get advantage). Then, with probability \( p \), you win the next point and win the game. If you lose it, go back to deuce.
• With probability \( 1-p \), your opponent gets advantage. If opponent wins next point (probability \( 1-p \)), you lose. If you win (prob \( p \)), back to deuce.

So, the recursive equation is:

\[ P = p \left[ p \cdot 1 + (1-p) P \right] + (1-p) \left[ p P \right] \]

Let’s expand:

\[ P = p^2 + p(1-p) P + (1-p)p P \] \[ P = p^2 + [p(1-p) + (1-p)p] P \] \[ P = p^2 + 2p(1-p) P \]

\[ P - 2p(1-p)P = p^2 \] \[ P [1 - 2p(1-p)] = p^2 \] \[ P = \frac{p^2}{1 - 2p(1-p)} \]

Plug in \( p = 0.7 \):

\[ 2p(1-p) = 2 \times 0.7 \times 0.3 = 0.42 \] \[ 1 - 0.42 = 0.58 \] \[ p^2 = 0.49 \] \[ P = \frac{0.49}{0.58} \approx 0.845 \]

3. Which Rule to Choose?

- 3 mini points rule probability: 0.784 - Deuce rule probability: 0.845

Conclusion: You should pick the deuce rule because it gives you a higher probability of winning (~84.5% vs ~78.4%).

2. Do You Know Bezout’s Theorem? (WorldQuant)

Question: Do you know Bezout’s theorem?

What is Bezout’s Theorem?

Bezout’s theorem is a fundamental result in algebraic geometry. It describes the number of intersection points of two projective plane curves.

• Statement: In the projective plane, two algebraic curves of degree \( m \) and \( n \) intersect in exactly \( m \times n \) points, counted with multiplicity, provided there is no component in common.

Bezout’s Theorem Explained with Examples

Suppose you have:

• A line (\( degree = 1 \))
• A circle (\( degree = 2 \))

How many intersection points? Plug into Bezout's theorem: \[ m = 1, n = 2 \implies 1 \times 2 = 2 \] So, a line and a circle intersect in 2 points (possibly coincident or complex, but always counting multiplicity).

General Formulation

Given two polynomials \( f(x, y) \) and \( g(x, y) \) of degrees \( m \) and \( n \), the number of solutions to: \[ f(x, y) = 0 \\ g(x, y) = 0 \] in the complex projective plane is exactly \( m \times n \), provided the curves have no component in common.

Why is Bezout’s Theorem Important in Quant Interviews?

• Shows your mathematical maturity and familiarity with algebraic geometry
• Useful for understanding systems of equations and their solutions
• Helps in advanced financial modeling where polynomial systems occur

3. Why Add L2 Penalty to Linear Regression? (Citadel)

Question: Why add the L2 penalty to linear regression?

What is the L2 Penalty?

In linear regression, the L2 penalty is known as Ridge Regression. It adds the sum of squared coefficients to the loss function:

\[ \text{Loss} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (y_i - \hat{y}_i)^2 + \lambda \sum_{j=1}^{p} \beta_j^2 \]

• \( \lambda \) is the regularization parameter controlling the strength of the penalty.
• \( \beta_j \) are the regression coefficients.

Why Add L2 Regularization?

• Prevents Overfitting: Penalizes large weights, keeping the model simpler and less likely to overfit to noise.
• Stability: Particularly useful when predictors (\( X \)) are highly correlated. Without regularization, the solution can become unstable.
• Numerical Benefits: Improves the condition number of \( X^T X \), leading to better numerical stability especially in high dimensions.
• Shrinks Coefficients: Encourages smaller weights, spreading influence across variables, which is beneficial in high-dimensional datasets.

Example: OLS vs Ridge Regression

Python Code Example

import numpy as np
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression, Ridge

X = np.random.randn(100, 10)
y = X @ np.arange(10) + np.random.randn(100)

# OLS
ols = LinearRegression().fit(X, y)
print("OLS Coefficients:", ols.coef_)

# Ridge Regression
ridge = Ridge(alpha=1.0).fit(X, y)
print("Ridge Coefficients:", ridge.coef_)

4. Dealing with OLS in High Dimension and Correlated X (Squarepoint Capital)

Question: What can we do to deal with OLS in high dimension, when we have high correlation among X and some other flaws in data?

Challenges in High-Dimensional OLS

• High-dimensional X: More predictors than samples (\( p > n \)), or p close to n.
• Multicollinearity: Predictors highly correlated, leading to unstable estimates.
• Noisy or incomplete data: Outliers, missing values, or non-normality.

Solutions and Techniques

• Regularization:
  • Ridge Regression (L2): As described above, shrinks coefficients, stabilizes estimates.
  • Lasso Regression (L1): Adds \( \lambda \sum |\beta_j| \) penalty, performs variable selection by setting some coefficients to zero.
  • Elastic Net: Combination of L1 and L2, useful if you suspect both many weak predictors and high correlation.
• Dimensionality Reduction:
  • PCA (Principal Component Analysis): Projects X onto orthogonal components, reduces correlation and dimensionality.
  • Partial Least Squares (PLS): Similar to PCA, but components are chosen to maximize covariance with y.
• Feature Engineering and Selection:
  • Remove or combine highly correlated features.
  • Use domain knowledge to select relevant predictors.
• Robust Regression:
  • Use methods less sensitive to outliers (e.g., Huber regression).
• Cross-Validation:
  • To select hyperparameters and prevent overfitting.

Python Example: Ridge, Lasso, and PCA

from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge, Lasso
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score

# Ridge
ridge = Ridge(alpha=1.0)
ridge_scores = cross_val_score(ridge, X, y, cv=5)

# Lasso
lasso = Lasso(alpha=0.1)
lasso_scores = cross_val_score(lasso, X, y, cv=5)

# PCA + OLS
pca = PCA(n_components=5)
X_pca = pca.fit_transform(X)
ols = LinearRegression()
pca_scores = cross_val_score(ols, X_pca, y, cv=5)

5. Expected Number of Flips to Get 2 Heads (Citadel)

Question: What is the expected number of flips to see 2 heads from a series of fair coin tosses?

Modeling the Problem

• Coin is fair (\( p = 0.5 \)).
• Keep tossing until you get 2 heads (not necessarily consecutive).

Solution: Use States and Linear Equations

• Let \( E_0 \) = expected number of flips to get 2 heads (starting from 0 heads).
• \( E_1 \) = expected number of flips to get 2 heads (starting from 1 head).
• \( E_2 = 0 \) (if you already have 2 heads, you stop).

We can set up equations:

• \( E_2 = 0 \)
• \( E_1 = 1 + 0.5 \times E_1 + 0.5 \times E_2 \)
• \( E_0 = 1 + 0.5 \times E_0 + 0.5 \times E_1 \)

Let’s explain each equation:

• \( E_2 = 0 \): If you already have 2 heads, you’re done; no more flips needed.
• \( E_1 \): If you have one head, you flip the coin:
  • With probability 0.5, you get head again (done, so it takes 1 flip).
  • With probability 0.5, you get tail (still have one head), so you’re back in the same state, needing \( E_1 \) more flips.
  • But since you always perform a flip, add 1 to expectation.
• \( E_0 \): If you have zero heads, you flip:
  • With probability 0.5, you get head (now have one head, need \( E_1 \) more flips).
  • With probability 0.5, you get tail (still zero heads, need \( E_0 \) more flips).
  • Again, always add 1 for the flip performed.

Solving the Equations Step by Step

Let’s start by solving for \( E_1 \):

\[ E_1 = 1 + 0.5 E_1 + 0.5 E_2 \] But \( E_2 = 0 \), so: \[ E_1 = 1 + 0.5 E_1 \] \[ E_1 - 0.5E_1 = 1 \] \[ 0.5 E_1 = 1 \] \[ E_1 = 2 \]

Now plug \( E_1 = 2 \) into the equation for \( E_0 \):

\[ E_0 = 1 + 0.5 E_0 + 0.5 E_1 \] \[ E_0 = 1 + 0.5 E_0 + 0.5 \times 2 \] \[ E_0 = 1 + 0.5 E_0 + 1 \] \[ E_0 - 0.5 E_0 = 2 \] \[ 0.5 E_0 = 2 \] \[ E_0 = 4 \]

Final Answer

The expected number of flips to see 2 heads is 4.

Generalization and Intuition

This result can be generalized: for a fair coin, the expected number of flips to get \( n \) heads (in total, not necessarily consecutive) follows the formula: \[ E(n) = 2n \] So, for 2 heads, expected flips = 4; for 3 heads, expected flips = 6, etc.

Conclusion: Mastering Quant Interviews at WorldQuant and Beyond

Quant interviews at firms like WorldQuant, Citadel, Susquehanna International Group, and Squarepoint Capital are designed to push candidates to think deeply about probability, statistics, mathematics, and data science. Each question above not only tests technical ability but also your reasoning and ability to clearly communicate solutions.

Key Takeaways from Each Question

• Probability & Decision Theory: Understanding recursive probability and optimal strategy selection (Tennis Deuce Problem).
• Mathematical Foundations: Familiarity with theorems like Bezout's shows strong mathematical background.
• Statistical Modeling: Knowing why and how to use regularization techniques like L2 (Ridge) regression is fundamental for robust predictive models.
• Handling Complexity: High-dimensional and correlated data are common in finance; being able to apply dimensionality reduction, regularization, and robust regression is crucial.
• Expected Value Reasoning: Setting up and solving Markov chain or recursive expectation problems efficiently is a must-have skill.

How to Prepare for Quant Interviews

• Practice Classic Problems: Study common probability puzzles, estimation, and combinatorial questions.
• Brush Up on Linear Algebra and Statistics: Understand the mechanics and mathematics behind regression, PCA, regularization, etc.
• Communicate Clearly: Practice explaining your thought process; clarity is as important as correctness.
• Use Python/R for Prototyping: Be able to quickly implement and test models and algorithms.
• Understand the Business Context: Know how these mathematical tools apply to real-world finance and trading problems.

Further Resources

• Quant Stack Exchange
• Wilmott Forums
• Scikit-learn Documentation

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Summary

Preparation for quant interviews—whether at WorldQuant, Citadel, or other top firms—requires rigorous practice with mathematical reasoning, probability, statistics, and data analysis. The sample questions and solutions provided here cover a wide range of topics, from theoretical math to practical data science, and serve as a solid foundation for your interview preparation. Keep practicing, stay curious, and you’ll be well on your way to acing your next quant interview!

Related Articles

• Quant Research Interview Questions - Jane Street
• Quant Interview Questions - Akuna Capital
• Quant Interview Question - Jane Street
• Quant Research Interview Test - Jane Street
• Quant Interview Question - JP Morgan