Dataloopr

The demand for talented data scientists continues to soar as tech giants like Uber, Tesla, Linkedin, and Facebook seek professionals who not only know machine learning algorithms but can also apply statistical thinking to real-world business problems. In this detailed guide, we’ll walk through real data scientist interview questions from Uber, Linkedin, Tesla, and Facebook, providing step-by-step explanations, best practices, and code snippets where appropriate. This article is designed to help you master both conceptual and practical aspects of data science interviews, with a focus on modeling, statistics, probability, and product analytics.

Uber Data Science Interview: Measuring Bias in Predicting Food Preparation Times

Question Recap

Let's say that you work as a data scientist at a food delivery company. You are tasked with building a model to predict food preparation times at a restaurant from the time when a customer sends in the order to when the meal is ready for the driver to pick up.

What are some reasons why measuring bias would be important in building this particular model?

Understanding Bias in Predictive Modeling

Bias in statistical or machine learning models refers to the systematic error introduced by approximating a real-world problem, which may be complex, by a much simpler model. In this case, your model is attempting to predict the time it takes for a restaurant to prepare food, which is inherently variable and influenced by many factors.

Why is Measuring Bias Crucial?

• Customer Experience: If your model systematically underestimates preparation times, customers will be disappointed by late deliveries. Overestimation could lead to drivers arriving too early, resulting in wasted time and cold food.
• Operational Efficiency: Accurate prep time predictions optimize driver dispatching, allowing for better route planning and reduced wait times.
• Restaurant Partner Relationships: Restaurants may receive negative feedback if your model consistently misjudges their prep times, damaging business relationships.
• Algorithm Fairness: Bias can lead to certain types of cuisine, order sizes, or peak hours being unfairly penalized or favored, impacting business metrics.

Types of Bias in This Context

• Selection Bias: If training data only includes popular restaurants, the model may not generalize to new or less-frequented establishments.
• Measurement Bias: Inaccurate time stamps or missing data can skew prep time estimates.
• Model Bias: Over-simplistic models may fail to capture important features like time of day, weather, or special events.

Measuring and Mitigating Bias

• Residual Analysis: Analyze residuals (difference between actual and predicted times) across different restaurants, cuisines, and order types.
• Segmented Performance Metrics: Calculate RMSE/MAE for different segments (e.g., breakfast vs. dinner, weekdays vs. weekends).
• Feature Engineering: Include variables that capture prep time variability, such as order size, menu complexity, and kitchen staff count.

Code Example: Residual Analysis in Python

import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Assume df contains columns: 'actual_prep_time', 'predicted_prep_time', 'restaurant_id'
df['residual'] = df['actual_prep_time'] - df['predicted_prep_time']

# Group by restaurant to check bias
restaurant_bias = df.groupby('restaurant_id')['residual'].mean()
restaurant_bias.hist(bins=30)
plt.title('Distribution of Average Residuals by Restaurant')
plt.xlabel('Average Residual (minutes)')
plt.ylabel('Number of Restaurants')
plt.show()

Linkedin Data Science Interview: Probability with Increasing Cards

Question Recap

Imagine a deck of 500 cards numbered from 1 to 500. If all the cards are shuffled randomly and you are asked to pick three cards, one at a time, what's the probability of each subsequent card being larger than the previous drawn card?

Restating the Problem

Given 500 unique cards, after shuffling, you pick three cards, one at a time without replacement. What is the probability that the sequence of drawn cards is strictly increasing? That is, the second card is larger than the first, and the third is larger than the second: \( C_1 < C_2 < C_3 \).

Generalizing the Probability

When drawing three cards from any set of \( n \) unique cards, each possible order of three distinct cards is equally likely. The total number of ways to choose and order three cards is:

\[ \text{Total ordered triples} = n \times (n-1) \times (n-2) \]

But since the cards are labeled, each combination of three distinct cards can appear in \( 3! = 6 \) possible orders, only one of which is strictly increasing.

\[ \text{Number of increasing sequences} = \binom{n}{3} \]

So the probability is:

\[ P(\text{increasing order}) = \frac{\binom{n}{3}}{n \times (n-1) \times (n-2)} \]

But, \( \binom{n}{3} = \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)}{6} \), so:

\[ P = \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)/6}{n(n-1)(n-2)} = \frac{1}{6} \]

Intuitive Explanation

• Every set of three drawn cards has six possible orders, but only one is strictly increasing.
• Thus, the answer is always \( \frac{1}{6} \) for any set of three distinct cards drawn without replacement from a shuffled deck.

Final Answer for 500 Cards

\[ \boxed{\frac{1}{6}} \]

Tesla Data Science Interview: Biases in Airline Boarding Time Studies

Question Recap

Suppose there exists a new airline named Jetco flying domestically across North America. Jetco recently had a study commissioned that tested the boarding time of every airline and it came out that Jetco had the fastest average boarding times of any airline.

What factors could have biased this result and what would you look into?

Potential Sources of Bias

• Sampling Bias: Was the sample of Jetco flights representative? If Jetco’s sample included more short-haul or less crowded flights, results could be skewed.
• Time of Day/Week: Flights at off-peak hours generally have faster boarding.
• Airport Differences: Some airports are more efficient or less busy, affecting boarding times.
• Aircraft Size: Smaller planes board faster. If Jetco has smaller average aircraft, their times would naturally be lower.
• Boarding Procedures: Differences in policies (e.g., assigned seating vs. open seating, boarding by zones vs. rows) can impact speed.
• Passenger Demographics: If Jetco caters to business travelers (possibly more efficient boarders) vs. families or large groups.
• Study Funding/Design: As Jetco commissioned the study, there may be design or reporting bias (selective reporting, favorable definitions, etc.).

What to Investigate Further

• Raw Data Distribution: Compare the distribution of boarding times, not just the means.
• Control for Confounders: Use regression analysis or matching to account for plane size, route, airport, and time of flight.
• Sampling Methodology: Check if flights were randomly sampled and if all airlines had similar proportions of flight types.
• Operational Definitions: Ensure “boarding time” is defined and measured consistently across airlines.

Example: Regression to Control for Confounders

import statsmodels.api as sm

# Assume df has columns: 'boarding_time', 'airline', 'plane_size', 'airport', 'time_of_day'
X = pd.get_dummies(df[['airline', 'plane_size', 'airport', 'time_of_day']], drop_first=True)
y = df['boarding_time']

model = sm.OLS(y, sm.add_constant(X)).fit()
print(model.summary())

Facebook Data Science Interview: Measuring Product Health for Mentions App

Question Recap

Let's say you're a product data scientist at Facebook. Facebook is rolling out a new feature called "Mentions" which is an app specifically for celebrities on Facebook to connect with their fans.

How would you measure the health of the Mentions app? And if a celebrity starts using Mentions and begins interacting with their fans more, what part of the increase can be attributed to a celebrity using Mentions versus what part is just a celebrity wanting to get more involved in fan engagement?

Measuring the Health of the Mentions App

Key Metrics to Track

• Daily/Weekly/Monthly Active Users (DAU/WAU/MAU): Number of unique celebrities using Mentions over time.
• Engagement Rate: Average number of posts, replies, or live sessions per celebrity.
• Fan Interactions: Number of likes, comments, shares, and new followers resulting from Mentions activity.
• Retention: Percentage of celebrities returning to the app after 7, 30, 90 days.
• Feature Adoption: Percentage of celebrities using new features (e.g., live Q&A, video posts).
• Churn Rate: Percentage of celebrities who stop using the app.

Attribution: Mentions vs. Celebrity Motivation

Suppose a celebrity’s engagement increases after starting to use Mentions. How much of the increase is due to the app (causal effect) versus the celebrity’s own intent to engage more with fans?

• Selection Bias: Celebrities who want to engage more may be more likely to adopt Mentions, so the observed increase isn’t fully attributable to the app.
• Difference-in-Differences (DiD) Approach: Compare the change in engagement for celebrities who start using Mentions to those who don’t, before and after the adoption.

Difference-in-Differences (DiD) Example

Assume you have two groups:

• Treatment group: Celebrities who started using Mentions at time \( t_0 \)
• Control group: Celebrities who did not adopt Mentions during the same period

Calculate the average engagement metric (e.g., posts per week) before and after \( t_0 \) for both groups.

\[ \text{DiD Effect} = (E_{\text{treatment, after}} - E_{\text{treatment, before}}) - (E_{\text{control, after}} - E_{\text{control, before}}) \]

This estimates the causal impact of Mentions, controlling for general time trends or celebrity motivation.

Code Example: DiD in Python

import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

# Assume df has columns: 'engagement', 'post_period', 'treatment_group', 'celebrity_id'
# post_period: 0 = before, 1 = after; treatment_group: 1 = adopted Mentions, 0 = control

model = smf.ols('engagement ~ post_period * treatment_group + celebrity_id', data=df).fit()
print(model.summary())

Probability and Statistics: Distribution of 2X - Y

Question Recap

Given X and Y are independent variables with normal distributions, what is the mean and variance of the distribution of \( 2X - Y \) when the corresponding distributions are \( X \sim N(3, 2^2) \) and \( Y \sim N(1, 2^2) \)?

Linear Combination of Normals

• If \( X \sim N(\mu_X, \sigma_X^2) \), \( Y \sim N(\mu_Y, \sigma_Y^2) \), and they are independent, then for \( Z = aX + bY \):
• \[ \text{Mean: } \mu_Z = a\mu_X + b\mu_Y \]
• \[ \text{Variance: } \sigma_Z^2 = a^2 \sigma_X^2 + b^2 \sigma_Y^2 \] (since Cov(X,Y) = 0)

Applying to Problem

• \( a = 2 \), \( b = -1 \)
• \( \mu_X = 3 \), \( \sigma_X^2 = 4 \)
• \( \mu_Y = 1 \), \( \sigma_Y^2 = 4 \)

Mean: \[ \mu_{2X-Y} = 2 \times 3 + (-1) \times 1 = 6 - 1 = 5 \]

Variance: \[ \sigma^2_{2X-Y} = 2^2 \times 4 + (-1)^2 \times 4 = 4 \times 4 + 1 \times 4 = 16 + 4 = 20 \]

Final Answer

The distribution of \( 2X - Y \) is: \[ 2X - Y \sim N(5, 20) \]

Conclusion

Data science interviews at

top tech companies like Uber, Tesla, LinkedIn, and Facebook are designed to rigorously test both your theoretical knowledge and your practical problem-solving abilities. Mastering topics such as bias and variance in modeling, probability, experiment design, and causal inference is crucial not only for passing interviews but also for real-world data science success.

Summary Table of Key Concepts and Solutions

Deep Dive: Why These Data Science Concepts Matter

Bias and Variance: The Heart of Predictive Modeling

Every predictive model faces a trade-off between bias (systematic error) and variance (random error). High bias can make your model too rigid, missing important trends. High variance leads to overfitting, where the model performs well on training data but poorly on new data. At companies like Uber, where prediction accuracy impacts real-time logistics, recognizing and minimizing bias ensures a better customer and partner experience.

Combinatorics and Probability: Foundation of Data Science Reasoning

Many interview problems (like the LinkedIn card question) test your ability to reduce complex scenarios to mathematical fundamentals. Understanding how to count possibilities and calculate probabilities is essential for designing A/B tests, interpreting results, and building robust models.

Experimental Design: Avoiding Confounding and Bias

Whether designing a study for Tesla or analyzing new product features at Facebook, recognizing sources of bias and confounding is crucial. Without careful experimental design and adjustment for confounders, any observed effect could be misleading. Regression, matching, and difference-in-differences are powerful tools to isolate true causal effects.

Product Metrics and Causal Inference: Measuring What Matters

Product data scientists must not only track usage and engagement, but also distinguish correlation from causation. For Facebook’s Mentions app, difference-in-differences helps separate the effect of the feature from the inherent motivation of celebrity users. This ensures business decisions are driven by genuine product impact.

Linear Combinations of Random Variables: Real-World Applications

Understanding how means and variances combine is foundational when building ensemble models, aggregating predictions, or modeling uncertainty. Whether in finance, logistics, or tech, these skills are used daily by data scientists.

Tips for Acing Data Scientist Interviews

• Clarify the Problem: Restate the question and clarify assumptions before jumping to solutions.
• Show Your Work: Interviewers value your thought process as much as the final answer. Write out equations, pseudocode, or sketches as needed.
• Communicate Clearly: Explain your reasoning, especially when dealing with non-technical stakeholders.
• Check Edge Cases: Ask about data quality, missing values, and unusual scenarios.
• Practice Coding: Be comfortable with Python or R for quick data analysis, visualization, and modeling.
• Brush Up on Statistics: Review distributions, hypothesis tests, and basic probability before the interview.
• Prepare Product Sense: Be ready to suggest metrics and experimental designs for new product features.

Further Reading and Practice

• Leetcode Statistics Problems
• Data Analysis with Python

Conclusion

Data science interviews at Uber, Tesla, LinkedIn, and Facebook go beyond algorithms and code—they probe your statistical intuition, business sense, and ability to reason under uncertainty. By practicing real interview questions, explaining your logic clearly, and connecting statistical concepts to real business value, you’ll be well prepared to land your dream data science role.

Keep learning, stay curious, and remember: every data point tells a story. Your job is to find it!

Related Articles

• Data Scientist Interview Question - Amazon
• Data Science Interview Question - Banking
• Data Science Interview Question - Retail
• Data Science Interview Question - Ecommerce
• Data Science Interview Question - Customer Attrition